
In recent developments, the Ittehad Tanzeemat-i-Madaris Pakistan, a coalition of seminaries in Pakistan, has asserted its commitment to maintaining the autonomy of religious educational institutions. This stance marks a significant shift from the 2019 agreement, where traditional madressah boards had consented to some oversight by the federal education ministry. The current position emphasizes that seminaries will not become subservient to government authorities, drawing a clear line between religious education and state control.
Historical Context
The relationship between seminaries and the government in Pakistan has been complex. In 2019, under certain pressures, madressah boards agreed to administrative oversight by the education ministry, believing it preferable to other forms of control. However, this arrangement has been met with criticism and concern over potential governmental interference in religious education.
Recent Developments
The recent statement by the Ittehad Tanzeemat-i-Madaris Pakistan reflects a collective decision to revert to the previous stance of autonomy. Mufti Taqi Usmani, a prominent religious scholar, emphasized that seminaries will not become subservient to authorities in Pakistan, likening the situation to the autonomy enjoyed by seminaries in countries like Saudi Arabia, the UAE, and Egypt.
Political Dynamics
The political landscape surrounding this issue is also noteworthy. The Muttahida Qaumi Movement (MQM), which had previously supported the 2019 agreement, has now shifted its position. MQM chief Khalid Maqbool Siddiqui expressed support for the JUI-F leader, Maulana Fazlur Rehman, urging the government to proceed with the proposed legislation to restore the autonomy of seminaries.
Government’s Response
The government’s response to this development has been cautious. Law Minister Azam Nazeer Tarar acknowledged the legal complexities arising from the Societies Registration (Amendment) Bill 2024, which aims to restore the autonomy of seminaries. He proposed discussions with Maulana Fazlur Rehman to resolve the issue, indicating a willingness to engage in dialogue to address the concerns of religious educational institutions.
Implications for Religious Education
The insistence on autonomy by seminaries underscores the importance of religious freedom and the separation of religious education from governmental control. This development has broader implications for the future of religious education in Pakistan, potentially influencing policies related to curriculum, administration, and the overall relationship between religious institutions and the state.
Conclusion
The recent stance taken by the Ittehad Tanzeemat-i-Madaris Pakistan highlights the ongoing tension between religious educational institutions and government authorities in Pakistan. As discussions continue, the outcome will significantly impact the autonomy of seminaries and the nature of religious education in the country.

Leave a comment